Compare Azure Load Balancer SKUs (Basic vs Standard) features and pricing.
Last verified: May 2026
Output will appear here...You're inheriting a 5-year-old Azure deployment with 12 Basic Load Balancers fronting production traffic. The platform team gives you a Q3 deadline to migrate before the September 2025 deprecation. You run each LB through the compare tool, generating a migration plan with the per-LB feature gaps (8 need NSGs added before migration, 3 need backend pool re-architecting, 1 can be replaced by Application Gateway entirely). You execute the plan in 6 weeks and avoid the forced migration window.
The Azure Load Balancer SKU Compare tool provides a detailed feature and pricing comparison between Azure Load Balancer Basic and Standard SKUs. It covers differences in backend pool size, health probes, availability zones, SLA guarantees, security posture, and cost. The tool helps you make an informed decision about which SKU to deploy for your workload.
The compare tool surfaces 25+ feature comparisons across Basic and Standard SKUs (backend pool size, health probe protocols, AZ support, SLA, security defaults, outbound rules, HA ports, and more) and runs your usage profile (instance count, AZ requirements, workload tier) through a recommendation engine that produces a 'Use Standard' or 'Use Basic' verdict with reasoning. It also includes the September 2025 retirement date for Basic SKU as an automatic disqualifier for new deployments.
Basic SKU is being retired across all Azure regions on September 30, 2025. New deployments in many regions already block Basic SKU. If you're greenfield in 2026, don't even consider Basic — the migration tooling exists, but it's a forced migration on a deadline you don't control.
Standard SKU is 'secure by default' which means inbound traffic is denied unless explicitly allowed by an NSG. Teams migrating from Basic frequently get cut off because their backend VMs had no NSG before and didn't need one — Standard SKU breaks this implicit allow.
Standard SKU uses zone-redundant frontends by default in zonal regions. This is essentially free additional resilience compared to Basic's single-zone deployment. The 99.99% SLA only applies if you actually deploy zone-redundant frontends, not if you pin to a single zone.
Was this tool helpful?
Disclaimer: This tool runs entirely in your browser. No data is sent to our servers. Always verify outputs before using them in production. AWS, Azure, and GCP are trademarks of their respective owners.