Compare virtual desktop solutions (WorkSpaces, AVD, Cloud Workstations, OCI Secure Desktops).
Output will appear here...The comparison table is a static, hand-maintained dataset of feature rows grouped by category (overview, networking, compute, storage, security, pricing) with free-text search across all fields; it's a reference snapshot, not a live pricing feed, always confirm current per-seat pricing and licensing interactions (especially AVD's M365 dependency) directly with the provider before finalizing a VDI cost model.
A comparison of managed virtual desktop offerings across Amazon WorkSpaces, Azure Virtual Desktop (AVD), Google's Chrome Enterprise/Cloud Workstations, and OCI Secure Desktops, and the licensing model is where the real cost surprises live: AVD carries no separate service fee at all for organizations already holding Microsoft 365 E3/E5 licenses (you pay only for the underlying VM), while WorkSpaces bills per-desktop monthly or hourly regardless of any existing licensing, a difference that can make AVD dramatically cheaper for an already-Microsoft-licensed enterprise and irrelevant for one that isn't.
Always factor existing Microsoft licensing into an AVD cost comparison explicitly, comparing AVD's advertised 'no service fee' against WorkSpaces' all-in per-desktop price without accounting for whether your org already pays for qualifying M365 licenses produces a misleading cost comparison in either direction.
FSLogix profile container sizing on AVD (or root/user volume sizing on WorkSpaces) is a common source of slow logon complaints at scale, undersized profile storage causes profile-load delays that get blamed on 'the VDI platform being slow' when it's actually a storage sizing issue.
GPU-accelerated desktop bundles (WorkSpaces Graphics/GraphicsPro, AVD NV-series, Cloud Workstations with T4/L4) cost meaningfully more than standard bundles, provision GPU desktops only for users with an actual graphics workload rather than as a default tier.
The AVD service fee itself is waived for users covered by qualifying Microsoft 365 or Windows licenses, but you still pay for the underlying VM compute, storage, and networking, AVD isn't free overall, just free of the separate per-user VDI service charge that WorkSpaces, Cloud Workstations, and OCI Secure Desktops all bill as part of their pricing.
A pooled (multi-session) desktop is a shared session on a VM serving multiple users, cost-efficient but with less per-user customization persistence, common for task workers with standardized needs. A persistent desktop is dedicated to one user with state that survives between sessions, better for users needing installed software or personalized configuration, at correspondingly higher per-user infrastructure cost. AVD supports both models natively; WorkSpaces is primarily persistent-desktop-oriented.
Not exactly, Cloud Workstations is positioned more specifically toward containerized developer environments than general knowledge-worker virtual desktops, while WorkSpaces and AVD both target the broader 'replace a physical office PC' use case. If the goal is a general-purpose managed desktop fleet rather than dev environments specifically, WorkSpaces or AVD are the more directly comparable options to GCP's offering.
Was this tool helpful?
Disclaimer: This tool runs entirely in your browser. No data is sent to our servers. Always verify outputs before using them in production. AWS, Azure, and GCP are trademarks of their respective owners.